Boole v. Union Marine Ins. Co., Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco; George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
Plaintiff sought to recover under two policies of insurance issued by the defendants, covering chartered freight on the oil barge “Pinta,” which was sunk in San Francisco Bay. The jury found that the barge was not such a constructive total loss as to entitle the plaintiff to recover under the terms of the policies, and returned a verdict in his favor for expenses incurred by him in raising the barge, but against him for the other sums asked. Judgment was duly entered. A motion for a new trial was made by plaintiff and denied.
The judgment on the verdict was entered June 19, 1914. Appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. ClementsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- New York Life Insurance v. CravensSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Griffith v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Duskin v. Pennsylvania-Central Airlines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- Sears v. Illinois Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.