Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Peregrino

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 9, 2020No. 3:17-cv-01381Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:17-cv-01381 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) RAUL PEREGRINO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 53), and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 56).1 The parties have filed 1 There is some dispute between the parties regarding what issues they were allowed to present in their motions and whether they were allowed to move for summary judgment or just…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Heidi Hostettler v. College of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API