Long v. Hunter
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Aedrich, J., Hampton, Action by M. K. Fong against Hunter, Pierce, and Battey, for accounting, cancellation of mortgage, and damages. The amended complaint and amended supplemental complaint were ordered stricken out because the causes of action were not stated, as required by a previous order of .Judge Buchanan. From this order the plaintiff appeals. cite 11 S. C., 392. cites 5 Ency. P. & P., 336.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
A motion was made in this case before his Honor, Judge Buchanan, who made the following order: “On reading and filing motion papers herein, and on motion of I. L- Tobin, Esq., defendants’ attorney, it is ordered, that within twenty days after service of a copy of this order upon the plaintiff’s attorney, the plaintiff serve upon the defendants’ attorney a copy of the complaint, setting out each cause of action in a separate paragraph, duly numbered, and as a separate and distinct cause of action, each containing a plain and concise…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Jordan v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- McLeod v. American Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Squire, Supt. v. G. Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944
- White v. HarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935