Commonwealth v. Gray
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from the judgment of sentence after a jury found appellant guilty of two counts of robbery.1 He contends that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective for introducing appellant’s mugshot into evidence and failing to interview potential alibi witnesses; and (2) that the trial court erred in sentencing him on both robbery counts when they arose out of the same transaction. We agree in part with appellant’s first contention and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
*388On January 26, 1982, a robbery occurred at the Casbah Lounge in Pittsburgh. A man came into the bar and, after…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. DickersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. GlazeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. RozplochiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.