Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Glaze

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 21, 1987No. 01256PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for violations of the Controlled Substance Drug, Device & Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. §§ 780-101 to -141.1. Appellant contends that his guilty plea counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to withdraw his guilty plea and his post-verdict motions counsel was ineffective for failing to allege that his guilty plea colloquy was defective. He also contends that his sentence is inappropriate. For the reasons *520that follow, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for further proceedings.

Appellant, represented by a member of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. McClendonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. ColeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. FloodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. MunsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API