Jimmy Neuschafer v. Harol Whitley Attorney General for the State of Nevada, Respondents
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
860 F.2d 1470
Jimmy NEUSCHAFER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Harol WHITLEY; Attorney General for the State of Nevada,
Respondents- Appellees.
No. 88-1688.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued Feb. 29, 1988.
Submitted May 6, 1988.
Decided Nov. 3, 1988.
Mary E. Boetsch, Mooney & Boetsch, Ltd., Reno, Nev., for petitioner-appellant.
Brian McKay, Attorney General and David Sarnowski, Deputy Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev., for respondents-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Before CHAMBERS, ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges.
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Chambers; Concurrence · Alarcon.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wong Doo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Chessman v. TeetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.