Legal Opinion

Moore v. Staser

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1892No. 651Published

Erom the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion

On Petition eor a Rehearing.

Ross, J.

The appellee asks a rehearing in this case for the reason, as put by counsel, that the word attorney, “ when applied to one for whom a fee is provided in the execution of a promissory note, means an officer of court who performs services for a litigant in a court, and not a mere collecting agent.” Counsel then proceeds to say that the intent of the contracting parties was simply to pay “ attorney’s fees ” in case suit was brought to 'enforce the payment of the principal of the note. He also contends that the intention must be determined from custom, and *369that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Goss v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Harvey v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Tuley v. McClungIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Bond v. OrndorfIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API