United States v. Bates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Defendant Christopher Bates challenges his conviction and 57-month sentence for conspiracy to defraud the government by impeding the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to engage in mail and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and conspiracy to engage in money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1956(h). We affirm.
1. Defendant first argues that the district court erred by refusing to grant his motion for acquittal because there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to tie him to the conspiracies. On de novo…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Rodney Robert Kimbrew, A.K.A. Carlton CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David L. Smith, United States of America v. Herbert A. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jose Roman Ortega, AKA Romualdo Roman Ortega, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Dale Alan JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.