Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Oakdale Co-operative Electrical Ass'n

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The rule is well established that a company furnishing electric power for use in a private wiring system is not under obligation to inspect such system before supplying the current nor is it obligated to respond in damages for injuries sustained by reason of the defective condition of such system “unless it supplies current actually knowing of these conditions and the current is the cause of the injuries sued for, in which case it is the energizing of the line with knowledge of the conditions and not the conditions themselves which forms the basis of liability.” Oesterreich v. Claas (1941),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oesterreich v. ClaasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Holzschuh v. WebsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. McKenzie v. Clear Lake Union Free High School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gumz v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gumz v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  3. Transportation Insurance v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Gumz v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API