Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. Clear Lake Union Free High School District No. 1

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The purpose of'the summary-judgment statute was primarily to discourage dilatory pleading and practice. Prime Mfg. Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp. (1938) 229 Wis. 348, 281 N. W. 697.

The statute is drastic and should be applied only where it is perfectly plain that there is no substantial issue to be tried. Prime Mfg. Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp., supra; Marco v. Whiting (1944), 244 Wis. 621, 12 N. W. (2d) 926; Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc., (1945) 247 Wis. 166, 19 N. W. (2d) 276.

This court has held that defenses in abatement of an action may be raised by motion for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Binsfeld v. Home Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Marco v. WhitingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ausen v. MoriartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Snyder v. Oakdale Co-operative Electrical Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API