Legal Opinion

Holzschuh v. Webster

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

If there is any issue of fact raised which entitles plaintiff to a jury determination, the motion for summary judgment was properly’denied. Prime Mfg. Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp. (1938) 229 Wis. 348, 281 N. W. 697; Atlas Investment Co. v. Christ (1942), 240 Wis. 114, 117, 2 N. W. (2d) 714. The only contested issue of fact here presented is the speed of the defendants’ train. If the train was traveling at a rate of thirty-five miles an hour, and in view of the other undisputed facts, such speed was the proximate cause of the collision, plaintiff cannot be denied the right of a trial of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Atlas Investment Co. v. ChristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hanson v. HalvorsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Snyder v. Oakdale Co-operative Electrical Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Central Contracting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Beskidniak v. MasnyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API