Legal Opinion

Midkiff v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1934No. Criminal No. 799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The defendant, Midkiff, was prosecuted and convicted under an information filed in the superior court of Maricopa county, on May 5, 1933, by the county attorney, in words and figures (omitting the formal parts) as follows:

“The said H. D. Midkiff on or about the 24th day of February, 1933, and before the filing of this in formation at and in the County of Maricopa, State of Arizona, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and knowingly pretend, represent, and hold himself out to one Zack Durham as practicing, and entitled to practice law in the courts of record of the State of Arizona, he, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Branham v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cluff v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Atkin v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Thompson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Baker v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. State v. SernaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API