Pore v. Duke Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Walling,
This appeal by defendants, is from the lower court’s refusal to open a judgment entered upon a bond accompanying a mortgage. The record discloses nothing to indicate that the court abused its discretion therein. In May, 1918, J. E. Tracy, a real estate agent at Greens-burg, negotiated the purchase of a house and lot on Concord Street in that city for the defendants, Philip Duke and wife. They needed $2,000 to complete the purchase, which Tracy secured for them by a loan on the property. This he negotiated through Bell & Bell, attorneys for the plaintiff, Lottie…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Browne v. HoekstraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Dobbs v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Mynick v. BickingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Froio v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Shay v. SchrinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Judith v. Dicola Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Mallisee v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Kienberger v. LallySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.