Kienberger v. Lally
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The lower court refused to open a judgment entered upon a bond accompanying) a mortgage. The well-recognized rule is that an application to open a judgment entered upon a warrant of attorney is an equitable proceeding, addressed to the sound discretion of the court and to be disposed of in accordance with equitable principles. See Mielcuszny et ux. v. Rosol et ux., 317 Pa. 91, 176 A. 236. This record does not disclose anything that convicts the learned court below of abusing its authority.
The question for determination in this unfortunate case, where too much confidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Williams v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Browne v. HoekstraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Dobbs v. ZinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Froio v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Globe Motor Car v. First FidelityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Weiner v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting AnnuitiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Meyer v. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1967
- Time Sales Finance Corp. v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958