Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1947No. A-1307PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hickman

In this case petitioner recovered judgment for compensation against the respondent in the district court based upon answers of the jury to special issues. The Court of Civil Appeals reversed the trial court’s judgment on two grounds. 202 S. W. (2d) 258.

One of the grounds upon which the trial court’s judgment was reversed was its refusal to submit to the jury a requested instruction relating to circumstantial evidence. The requested instruction was in this language:

“gentlemen op the jury: You are charged as part of the law in this case that any fact before you may be established by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas Power & Light Co. v. CulwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Texas & N. O. R. v. CrowTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Hicks v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Placencio v. Allied Industrial International, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Owen Development Company v. CalvertTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Meyer v. Great American Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Petty Ex Rel. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Alvarez v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1984

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API