Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Stancato

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 22, 1960No. 18651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

An order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is the subject of this writ of error.

The plaintiffs in error, defendants below, were employed by Joe Stancato as instructors, enrollers and managers of the Denver-Boulder branch of the Stancato School of Accordion. The contracts of employment contained a covenant by the employees that they would not compete with their employer for a period of five years after terminating their employment. Defendants urge there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s action in issuing the injunction.

On…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spickerman v. SproulSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phoenix Capital, Inc. v. DowellColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Anderson v. PursellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Graham v. HoylSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Phoenix Capital, Inc. v. DowellColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API