Legal Opinion

Spickerman v. Sproul

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 28, 1958No. 18206PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Holland

In November of 1956, this action was instituted by filing a complaint for injunction and damages, and upon the denial by the trial court of the temporary injunction, a review of that order is hereby sought.

Security Addition No. 1 is located near Colorado Springs. A plat thereof was recorded November 12, 1953, and on March 2, 1954, a declaration of restrictive covenants was duly filed in connection therewith, dated February 25, 1954.

Plaintiffs, herein referred to as the Spickermans, purchased lot 10 in block 2 of the addition on February 25, 1954, subject to certain restrictive covenants as of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ireland v. WynkoopColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. COMBINED COMMUN. CORP. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. Crosby v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Allen v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Monatt v. Pioneer Astro Industries, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API