Legal Opinion

People v. Reyes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 2008PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*566The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his right to confront witnesses was violated by the admission of certain statements made by two accomplices to police detectives (see People v Marino, 21 AD3d 430, 431 [2005], cert denied 548 US 908 [2006]). In any event, the defendant’s right to confront witnesses against him was not violated since the challenged statements were not admitted for their truth but to show the police detectives’ state of mind and to demonstrate how the police investigation evolved (see Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36, 59 [2004]; People v…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. ProwseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. RagsdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API