Legal Opinion

RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHC Durham Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1996No. COA94-1392Published

1Opinion of the Court

473 S.E.2d 649 (1996)

RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff,

v.

CHC DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a TIMCO, INC., f/k/a Durham Corporation, f/k/a Richland Properties, Inc. and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants.

No. COA94-1392.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 6, 1996.

Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton, L.L.P. by Samuel T. Wyrick, III, Roger W. Knight, Bruce C. Johnson, and Lee M. Whitman, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Wyche & Story, by N. Hunter Wyche, Jr. and Claire B. Casey, Raleigh, for defendants-appellees.

McGEE, Judge.

Although the order of the trial court purports to be…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Bolick v. American Barmag Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Shore v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API