Legal Opinion
Muccino v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company brought an action in the common pleas court to appropriate certain land owned by Costanzo Muccino, the same being a city lot, with the buildings and improvements thereon, and being all the property owned by Muccino in that vicinity.
Muccino filed a petition in error in this court claiming that there were several errors in the trial in the common pleas court, but really relying upon but two of such claimed errors: First, error in charge of the court on the subject of burden of proof; and, second, error in refusing to permit evi dence of the claimed sale…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Loloff v. SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Naftzger v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cohn v. City & Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- State v. AmunsisWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Deercreek Local Board of Education v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
- In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Land of SeasOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
- In Re Appropriation of EasementOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.