Legal Opinion
In Re Appropriation of Easement
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 7, 1959No. 8681PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The state of Ohio has taken from the owners for highway purposes the following described real estate:
Parcel No. 29, a perpetual easement for highway purposes, comprising a strip of land 8 feet in depth and 350 feet in width; parcel 29-SL-l, a temporary right to construct a slope easement in accordance with plans and specifications and for no other purpose; and parcel 29-SL-2, a temporary right to construct a slope easement in accordance with plans and specifications and for no other purpose. Said parcels are needed in the construction and improvement of state route No. 125, sections…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rice v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Muccino v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Ohio Power Co. v. DillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Lands of WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. HaughnOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. HaughnOhio Court of Appeals · 2025