Taylor v. Ferguson

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

and prior to November 17,1888, S. E. Archer possessed the property in controversy, and thereon conducted a retail liquor business; but on that day, joined by his wife, he conveyed the lot in controversy and another to Ferguson.

Plaintiffs in error offered to prove by evidence admissible for that purpose, that on November 20, 1888, they brought an action against Archer to recover a sum of money due to them, in which they sued out attachment and caused it to be levied on property in controversy on next day; that judgment was rendered in their favor, foreclosing attachment…