Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Board of Education

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 6, 2010No. 2853 September Term, 2008, 0604 September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Sept.Term, 2009.

1Opinion of the Court

MEREDITH, Judge.

In this opinion, we address a question raised in two separate appeals about the statutory construction of a section of the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act, namely, Maryland Code, Labor & Employment Article (“LE”), § 9-629, a statute that was first enacted in 1987 to create an intermediate level of compensation for work-related injuries. We are persuaded that, in each case, the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“the Commission”) correctly applied LE § 9-629 in ordering that compensation be paid at the intermediate rate because the total compensation it awarded in each case…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Design Kitchen and Baths v. LagosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Paul v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Para v. Richards Group of Washington Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery County v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Montgomery Cnty. v. Cochran & BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Doe v. Buccini Pollin Group, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API