Anderson v. Board of Education
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Sept.Term, 2009.
1Opinion of the Court
MEREDITH, Judge.
In this opinion, we address a question raised in two separate appeals about the statutory construction of a section of the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act, namely, Maryland Code, Labor & Employment Article (“LE”), § 9-629, a statute that was first enacted in 1987 to create an intermediate level of compensation for work-related injuries. We are persuaded that, in each case, the Workers’ Compensation Commission (“the Commission”) correctly applied LE § 9-629 in ordering that compensation be paid at the intermediate rate because the total compensation it awarded in each case…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Design Kitchen and Baths v. LagosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Paul v. Glidden Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Para v. Richards Group of Washington Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Montgomery County v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Montgomery Cnty. v. Cochran & BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Doe v. Buccini Pollin Group, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011