Legal Opinion
Raimundo v. Fairchester Bakers, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 2, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The jury may not, however, infer that such witness would, if called, testify unfavorably to the party who failed to call him. (Perlman v. Shanck, 192 App. Div. 179, 183, 184; Murthey v. Murthey, 261 App. Div. 991; affd., 287 N. Y. 740.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Perlman v. ShanckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Murthey v. MurtheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Murthey v. MurtheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gill v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Flamm v. NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
- Zausmer v. SuozziNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Mintz v. WipperAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1955
- Orsolits v. H. Hyman Drum & Barrel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954