Legal Opinion

Ullo v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 22, 1949No. 276, Docket 21303PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs who have appealed were elevator men, porters, a handyman and a nightwatchman engaged in doing what is generally called the maintenance work in adjoining buildings known as 392 Fifth Avenue and 394 Fifth Avenue in the City of New York, and worked in the years 1938 to 1942 inclusive. The first building had eleven stories and a basement and the second was four stories high. The first three stories of each building had no partitions between them and both buildings were served by the same elevators and had a common heating service and sprinkler system. All…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Mabee v. White Plains Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. CallusSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Borden Co. v. BorellaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ware v. Guilford Building, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1969
  2. Batts v. Professional Building, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1967
  3. Jemerson v. Mercantile National Bank at DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API