Legal Opinion
Hale v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1967No. Civ. 23519PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This action for declaratory relief concerns the construction of the family exclusion and uninsured motorist clauses, respectively, of two automobile liability policies issued by the same insurer on two vehicles in the same family. The husband and wife collided while each was driving one of the family automobiles. The insurer, defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, hereafter State Farm, appeals from the portion of the judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Marie A. and Jessie L. Hale, awarding them costs, and holding that under the particular facts of the case, the family…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farmers Ins. Exch. v. GeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Farmers Ins. Exch. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Perlick v. Country Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. FrederickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Garcia v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Schwalbe v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- American Home Assurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Meritplan Insurance v. WoollumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HartleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.