Legal Opinion

Hafele v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1948No. Claim No. 28339PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law, without costs of this appeal to either party, and claim dismissed, without costs. Conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new finding and conclusions made. Memorandum: Claimant-respondent has had judgment against the State of New York based upon the principle of res ipsa loquitur as the result of the collapse of a section of a bridge spanning a creek. He was driving an automobile along a State highway which crossed the bridge. The end of the bridge farthest from *1023him fell downward a distance of about four feet and the front end of his automobile crashed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Sandler v. GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Massa v. Nippon Yusen KaishaNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Hafele v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drake v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Minotti v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1957
  3. Cox v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API