Legal Opinion

State v. Turck

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 2007No. A06-846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

On appeal from the district court’s decision to stay execution of respondent’s sentence and place him on probation, appellant State of Minnesota argues that the district court erred by failing to impose the mandatory-minimum sentence required under Minn.Stat. § 152.023, subd. 3(b) (2004). Because we conclude that the district court erred, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

Respondent Kevin Donald Turck pleaded guilty to one count of third-degree eon-trolled-substance crime in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.023, subds. 2(1), 3(b) (2004), for possession of 4.58…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. RonquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell HallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Jagger CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API