State v. Turck
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
On appeal from the district court’s decision to stay execution of respondent’s sentence and place him on probation, appellant State of Minnesota argues that the district court erred by failing to impose the mandatory-minimum sentence required under Minn.Stat. § 152.023, subd. 3(b) (2004). Because we conclude that the district court erred, we reverse and remand for resentencing.
FACTS
Respondent Kevin Donald Turck pleaded guilty to one count of third-degree eon-trolled-substance crime in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.023, subds. 2(1), 3(b) (2004), for possession of 4.58…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. RonquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell HallCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Jagger CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024