Legal Opinion
United States v. Ianniello
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 3, 1985No. S 85 Cr. 115 (CBM)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTLEY, Chief Judge.
The recently and hastily enacted Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984, Pub.L. No. 98-473, Title II, has, and no doubt, will continue to result in many thorny legal issues to be considered by the courts. Two such issues are before this court. Defendants have made an application seeking the release of certain funds now subject to a restraining order which was issued pursuant to an ex parte application by the Government. Additionally, defendants seek an order declaring that attorneys’ fees are exempt from forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. section 1963.
FACTS
Defendants Matthew…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. RumelySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Gutknecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Andrew F. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. BissellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Forfeiture Hearing As To Caplin & Drysdale, CharteredCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.