Legal Opinion · Dissent

Crawford v. State, Division of Parole & Community Services

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1991No. 89-1431Published

1DissentWright, J.

As a former trial judge I am well aware of the difficult and facially unpopular executive decision to set up a “halfway house” plan for long-term prisoners. This re-entry system, however, is an absolute necessity for reducing the *191high rate of recidivism common to this type of felon. Corrections experts believe that this methodology cuts the return to crime by half — surely a worthwhile goal. Today the majority has done grave damage to Ohio’s prisoner furlough program by perpetuating and enlarging our mistaken decision in Reynolds v. State (1984), 14 Ohio St. 3d 68, 14 OBR 506, 471 N.E. 2d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Williams v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Marshall v. WinstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API