Legal Opinion
Enyeart v. Minnesota
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 6, 2006No. Civ.05-1291 (MJD/AJB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action, Plaintiffs seek declaratory judgments against both the State of Minnesota and the federal government. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that the Minnesota Court of Appeals wrongly decided issues in affirming their state court convictions for tax evasion. Plaintiffs also seek a declaratory judgment as to how 49 U.S.C. § 40116 should be enforced by the federal government.
Currently before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Avis Budget Group, Inc. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Smalley v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2022
- Walsh v. Massonti Homecare LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021