Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Shoop

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1993No. 91-35494PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

The FDIC sued on a promissory note for FSLIC as successor to a failed savings and loan association. The debtors on the note claim that the suit is barred by Montana’s “one action rule.” Montana and several other states have a statute providing for “but one action” on a mortgage and the promissory note secured by it. The district court granted summary judgment for the FDIC, but we reverse.1

I. Facts.

In 1980, Bill Boyer and Jeff Shoop bought a business and associated real estate from Virginia O’Brien. They bought the real estate on a contract, with the deed to be held in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Glacier Campground v. Wild Rivers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Glacier Campground v. Wild Rivers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Standard Chemical Manufacturing Co. v. Employment Security DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. ShoopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. (PC)Allen v. AriasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. Angel Alvarez v. Douglas Colfer Long, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  4. Arellano v. HaskinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. DeLorenze v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API