Federal Deposit Insurance v. Shoop
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
The FDIC sued on a promissory note for FSLIC as successor to a failed savings and loan association. The debtors on the note claim that the suit is barred by Montana’s “one action rule.” Montana and several other states have a statute providing for “but one action” on a mortgage and the promissory note secured by it. The district court granted summary judgment for the FDIC, but we reverse.1
I. Facts.
In 1980, Bill Boyer and Jeff Shoop bought a business and associated real estate from Virginia O’Brien. They bought the real estate on a contract, with the deed to be held in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Glacier Campground v. Wild Rivers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1979
- Glacier Campground v. Wild Rivers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- Standard Chemical Manufacturing Co. v. Employment Security DivisionMontana Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. ShoopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- (PC)Allen v. AriasDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Angel Alvarez v. Douglas Colfer Long, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Arellano v. HaskinsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- DeLorenze v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.