Legal Opinion

Arellano v. Haskins

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 30, 2021No. 1:17-cv-01235Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIK ARELLANO, No. 1:17-cv-01235-NONE-JLT 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 CHAD HASKINS and FREDERICK MARTINEZ, (Doc. No. 46) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Erik Arellano (“plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit against 19 Bakersfield police officers Chad Haskins and Frederick Martinez (collectively, “defendants”), 20 asserting a claim of excessive use of force in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. 21 Constitution. Presently before…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API