Legal Opinion

Teeple v. Hawkeye Gold Dredging Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1908PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Hardin District Court.— Hon. J. H. Richards, Judge. Action at law to recover the money value of certain shares of the capital stock of the defendant company, to which plaintiff claims he was entitled, and which defendant refused to issue to him. There was a directed verdict in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

As conceded in the pleadings of both parties, the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of the province of British Columbia, Dominion of Canada. The answer fixes the time of its organization as of date May-19, 1904, and this is nowhere questioned in the record. In his petition plaintiff alleges that in May, 1904, he entered into an oral contract with one B. B. Bliss;, a representative of the defendant company, by the terms of which he, plaintiff, was to sell stock of the company, and for every ten shares sold by him he was to become entitled to, and the company was to issue to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dooley v. Gladiator Consolidated Gold Mines & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. German Savings Bank v. Bates Addition Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. M. M. Walker Co. v. Dubuque Fruit & Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Tracy v. Guthrie County Agricultural SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clifton v. TombCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  2. Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Hamill v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Manska v. San Benito Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Gallatin County Farmers' Alliance v. FlanneryMontana Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API