Legal Opinion

Steinle v. Kester

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1932No. 416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunkle, J.

The first ground is that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of the evidence. > ■

This is not made one of the grounds of error in the petition in error. An examination of the motion for a new trial filed in the lower court also discloses that the weight of the evidence was not made a ground of error in the lower court.

Notwithstanding this state of the record, we have examined the testimony and upon such examination are clearly of opinion that a reviewing court would not be justified in disturbing the verdict on the ground tha-t the same is against the manifest weight of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cave v. McLeanOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Helmig, Exr. v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Helmig, Exr. v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API