Cave v. McLean
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By GEIGER, J.
This matter arises in an action in which the plaintiffs below allege that the will of Maria J. Cave was not her last will and testament. The statutory issues were made and the matter submitted to a jury upon the evidence. The jury sustained the will. Errors assigned are to the effect (1) that the verdict is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and to law; (2) that the court erred in admitting testimony offered by defendants and objected to by plaintiffs; (31 that the court erred in refusing to give special instructions requested by plaintiffs; and (4) that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Snyder v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Van Demark v. Tompkins, Exr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- West v. LucasOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Steinle v. KesterOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CorbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Caswell v. LermannOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- State v. CorbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958