Legal Opinion

Helmig, Exr. v. Kramer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1934No. 1209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action in the trial court was a contest of the will of Elizabeth Helmig, deceased, present plaintiffs in error being ten of twenty-two defendants below, and the defendants in error being the plaintiffs in the trial court. We refer to the parties as they were styled below.

The petition of the plaintiffs was grounded upon two claims, namely: That the testatrix did not, at the time of the execution of the will under contest, have sufficient mental capacity to make such a will; and that the will was executed as a result of undue influence. Issues were made upon the answer of a guardianad litem…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. WalcuttOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Second National Bank v. New First National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. West v. LucasOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Steinle v. KesterOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Olney v. SchurrOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API