Legal Opinion

Sternlicht v. Sternlicht

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 2005No. 46 WAP 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

876 A.2d 904 (2005)

Harold C. STERNLICHT, Appellant,

v.

Lauri Davidson STERNLICHT, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued September 20, 2004.

Decided June 20, 2005.

Kerri Lee Cappella, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Harold C. Sternlicht.

Joanne Ross Wilder, Esq., Pittsburgh, for Lauri Davidson Sternlicht.

BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ.

OPINION

Justice BAER.

The sole issue before this Court is whether the Pennsylvania Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (PUTMA), 20 Pa.C.S. § 5301-5321, superseded the common law requirement that donative intent must exist in order…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API