Legal Opinion

United States v. King

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 25, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEAMAN, District Judge.

The defendant stands convicted under an indie tin out for assault with intent to commit rape. Both the accused and the assaulted woman are Oneida Indians, under charge of an Indian agent, and residing on the Oneida reservation, where the alleged assault was committed. Motion is made in arrest of judgment. and the only question presented is whether the offense is cognizable under the United States statutes. The power of congress to legislate in regard to crimes by or against the Indians as wards of the government is clearly settled by the decisions of the supreme court.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. In Re MayfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. United States v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Famous Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Columbia GeorgeOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1953
  3. United States v. CardishDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1906
  4. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. Ex parte HartDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API