Legal Opinion
United States v. Cardish
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 20, 1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions
On Motion to Quash Indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
QUARLES, District Judge.
This is a motion to quash am indictment framed under section 5386 of the Revised Statutes of the United States [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3648]. The indictment is in the words and figures following, to wit:
“The grand jurors of the United States of America, duly impaneled and sworn in and for the said eastern district of Wisconsin, in said district court upon their oath present: That Louisa La Motte and Lizzie Cardish are Indians, and were on the 17th day of January, A. D. 1905, each Indians, to wit, Menominee Indians, members of the Menominee Indian tribe, a tribe of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- United States v. LoganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1900
- State v. AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. BrandenburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Levinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. GilbertDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1974
- United States v. DeshaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.