Legal Opinion

People v. Eaton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 23, 2010No. 09PDJ099Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.19(c)

I. ISSUE AND SANCTION

Respondent failed to represent two separate clients with reasonable diligence and promptness, neglected to keep those clients reasonably informed, failed to hold a client's property separate from her own property, and misrepresented facts to a client. In some instances, Respondent knew or should have known of her misconduct, while in other instances Respondent acted negligently, at the least. Through her conduct, Respondent caused her clients serious injury or potential injury. Suspension is generally…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. People v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. People v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. People v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API