Legal Opinion

Elk River Ford, Inc. v. Hoecherl

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 13, 1988No. C5-88-349PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.

Appellant went into default on a loan for the purchase of a pickup truck. After repossession, respondent resold the truck, and sued appellant for a deficiency. Respondent contends, and the trial court agreed, that an overallowance or overvalue given on a trade-in for the resale of the truck was a commercially reasonable part of reselling the repossessed collateral. We affirm.

FACTS

The facts in this matter are not in dispute. In lieu of trial, the parties submitted the matter to the trial judge on stipulated facts and memoranda.

On May 22, 1981, appellant Mark…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fedders Corp. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  2. Thrower v. Union Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Don Jenkins & Son Ford-Mercury, Inc. v. CatletteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Madden v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HertzbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API