Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Hertzberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 11, 1994No. C8-93-1316PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Allen Hertzberg appeals from summary judgment, arguing there are material issues of fact concerning the commercial reasonableness of respondent Ford Motor Credit Company’s notice and sale of secured property. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for trial.
FACTS
In 1989, appellant Allen Hertzberg (Hertz-berg) financed the purchase of a truck through respondent Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford). When he was unable to make payments on the truck, Hertzberg attempted to sell it at a car lot owned by David Rose (Rose). Hertzberg agreed to sell the truck to Rose for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Chemlease Worldwide Inc. v. Brace, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Fedders Corp. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Karlstad State Bank v. FritscheCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mancuso v. Long Beach Acceptance Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Trapp v. HancuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re Estate of KingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003