Legal Opinion
Kidder v. Biddle
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1895No. 1,622PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From tbe Yigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The facts out of which this controversy arises are as follows:
On January 4, 1890, tbe Sandford Fork & Tool Company, by its then president, Robert Nixon, executed to appellees its note, of which the following is a copy, to-wit:
*654“$1,935.20. ' Terre Haute, Ind., Jan. 4, 1890.
“Four months after date, I promise to pay to the order, of C. M. Biddle & Co., nineteen hundred and thirty-five and tVV dollars, at National State Bank of Terre Haute, Ind. For value received without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws, with eight per cent, interest from maturity until paid, and attorney’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Laverty v. . SnethenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Alexander v. SwackhamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Boil v. SimmsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- McPheters v. PageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
- Northrup v. McGillMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- First National Bank v. RansfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Yeager and Sullivan, Inc. v. Farmers BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Seip v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Salvation Army, Inc. v. EllerbushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928
- State ex rel. Wheatley v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.