Legal Opinion
Northrup v. McGill
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1873PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Error to Sanilac Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
On the 17th of June, 1869, the parties entered into the following written agreement:
*235“ This agreement, made this 17th day of June, A. D.. 1869, between Attilus D. McGill, of the first part, and Myron Nortfirup, of the second part, both of Lexington, Sanilac county, Michigan, witnesseth: that for and in consideration of the sum of four hundred dollars, to him to be paid, the said Northrup hereby sells to McGill his share and interest in the drug store and business heretofore carried on by them, together with the stock of medicines, drugs, wines, liquors, toilet articles, perfumery, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baldwin v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
- Curtis v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
3Cited by18 opinions
- Winchester v. CraigMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Isaacs v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Johnston v. BallardTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- McKenzie v. Tom Gibson Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Roach v. RectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.