Legal Opinion
Harris v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 2005No. Nos. 04-35148, 04-35226PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Plaintiff Ruby Dell Harris appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants KING Broadcasting (“KING”), the Washington Firm, Ltd. (“Firm”), and the City of Seattle (“City”). She contends that she presented clear and convincing evidence that KING acted with actual malice in presenting her in a false light. She also maintains that she raised a genuine issue of material fact regarding the Firm’s good faith in investigating the way she handled workplace harassment complaints. She further asserts that the evidence was sufficient to withstand the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Suzuki Motor Corporation and American Suzuki Motor Corporation v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., a Non-Profit New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Biro v. Condé NastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Eramo v. Rolling Stone, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
- Adolfo Krans Bell Y Otros v. Antulio "Kobo" Santarrosa Y OtrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2007
- Al-Bustani v. AlgerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Gilmore v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.