Legal Opinion
Biro v. Condé Nast
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 1, 2013No. 11 Civ. 4442(JPO)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
This is a defamation action stemming from a profile of Plaintiff Peter Paul Biro, written by Defendant David Grann (“the Grann Article”), which appeared in the July 12-19, 2010 issue of the New Yorker magazine, published by Defendant Condé Nast, a division of Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. (“Advance”). In an opinion and order dated August 9, 2012, this Court examined each allegedly defamatory passage in the Grann Article and determined that four of roughly two dozen passages stated a claim for defamation under New *259York law. The remaining…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Biro v. Condé NastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. Bleeping Computer LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Adelson v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Edwards v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Kerik v. TacopinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.