Legal Opinion

Smith v. Washington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1999No. 49A04-9808-CV-398Published

1Opinion of the Court

716 N.E.2d 607 (1999)

James H. SMITH, Appellant/Cross-Appellee-Plaintiff,

v.

Wilbert WASHINGTON, M.D., Appellee/Cross-Appellant-Defendant.

No. 49A04-9808-CV-398.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

September 28, 1999.

Thomas C. Doehrman, Conour Doehrman Starkey, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.

Todd J. Kaiser, Peter H. Pogue, Locke Reynolds Boyd & Weisell, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiff-Appellant, James Smith (Smith), appeals the trial court's conclusion that the damages awarded to him be reduced by fifty percent (50%).…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Parker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API