Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Rose

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 16, 1981No. 80-3337PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WISEMAN, District Judge.

Petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the grounds that: (1) his fourth amendment rights were violated by the seizure of evidence used against him at trial under a warrant that was issued pursuant to an untruthful affidavit; (2) his double jeopardy rights were violated by his retrial, granted upon his own motion, after which he obtained a harsher sentence; and (3) he was not afforded effective assistance of counsel at trial. The petition shall be denied.

Facts

On August 24,1977, a jury of the Robertson County Criminal Court found…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gray v. RoseDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1985
  2. Smith v. AtkinsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  3. Allen v. DuttonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1984
  4. Johnnie Ray Grimsley v. Ray M. Dodson, Sheriff J. Marshall Coleman, Attorney General of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Johnnie Ray Grimsley v. Ray M. Dodson, Sheriff J. Marshall Coleman, Attorney General of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API