Legal Opinion
Stern v. Sequal Technologies, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 6, 2012No. Case No. C10-1257JLRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.
This patent infringement case comes before the court on Defendant SeQual Technologies, Ine.’s (“SeQual”) motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. (Mot. (Dkt. # 27).) Plaintiffs Michael Stern and DigiFLO, Inc. (“DigiFLO”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose the motion. (Resp. (Dkt. #32).) Having considered the briefing of the parties, the oral arguments of counsel on January 3, 2012, the relevant law, and the balance of the record, the court GRANTS the motion (Dkt. #27).
I.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
- Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC v. OFFICE KICK, INC.; and CKNAPP SALES, INC.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
- Schuyleman v. Barnhart Crane and Rigging CoDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025